Some Oral Remarks by Prof. James Tabor Delivered at the American Academy of Religion Annual Meeting, 1997
The complicated complex of terminology related to understanding the apocalypticism in the Scrolls--in particular the expectation, appearance, function, and outcome of various "Redemptive Figures" mentioned--has received careful attention by scholars [John Collins, The Star and the Scepter]. These designations arise, for the most part, directly from the Hebrew Scriptures--Prophet, Priest, Messiahs, Stone, Branch, Prince, Messenger, Servant, Star, Scepter, and so forth. I am using "Messiah" here in the most generic sense--not merely to refer to an ideal Davidic King, but to one who is understood to function as a central figure or chief agent in ushering in and mediating the expected arrival of the Kingdom of God [Dan 2:44]. In other words, the Scrolls, as a corpus, do not refer to just one figure but reflect a developing and shifting, even speculative application of the complexity of the Hebrew Scriptures themselves. I begin with the Community Rule (1QS) where we find no indication that any such messianic figures have appeared on the scene. Rather, the community itself expresses its self-understanding as the new covenant community of the Last Days.
Here we have very possibly have three figures in mind. The Prophet is clearly the "Prophet like Moses" (Deut 18), elsewhere identified as the Star (Num 24:17) or Interpreter (Doresh HaTorah) or Teacher of Righteousness. "Messiahs", if taken as two, most likely refers to the coming of both a Davidic "Prince of the Congregation" (elsewhere called "the Scepter"; Num 24:17 again), and a Priestly/Aaronic Messiah or anointed one. These are referred to in Zech 4:14 as the two "sons of fresh oil" (b'nai HaYitzhar) "who stand before the "Lord" (Adon) of the whole earth" (Rev 11). We can definitely document the appearance of the Prophet or Teacher of Righteousness; however, I find no evidence anywhere in the entire DSS corpus of the appearance of his two messiahs. The Damascus Document (CD) is absolutely crucial in this regard. Two manuscripts (A & B) found in the Cairo Geniza by S. Schechter in 1897 were also found in extensive fragments in Caves 4, 5, and 6 at Qumran. The introductory lines of Col I clearly refer to the appearance of the Teacher 390 years after the Babylonian Exile (586 BCE) and twenty years after the origin of the New Covenant movement: He visited them and He caused a plant root to spring from Israel and Aaron to inherit His Land and to prosper on the good things of His earth. And they perceived their iniquity and recognized that they were guilty men, yet for twenty years they were like blind men groping for the way. And God observed their deeds, that they sought Him with a whole heart, and He raised up for them a Teacher of Righteousness to guide them in the way of His heart. What I find rather striking is that in CD manuscript A, other than
in this introduction, there is no direct reference to the arrival and
career of this Teacher. Indeed, in Col VII we find reference to the
"Star and Scepter" promise of Number 24 with a decidedly "future" cast
to it--as if neither figure had appeared. And in Col VI we read: "He
raised up from Aaron men of discernment and from Israel men of wisdom…until
he comes who shall teach righteousness at the end of days."
What is even more striking is that CD manuscript B recasts manuscript
A (Col VII) and quotes Zech 13:7: "Awake O Sword against my Shepherd,
against the man who is my fellow, says God--smite the shepherd and the
sheep shall be scattered, and I will turn mine hand upon the little
ones." This "smiting" of the Shepherd, whom I take here to be the Teacher,
appears parallel in this fragment to his "gathering in." At this very
point in the text, fragment B edits out the reference in A to the Numbers
24 "Star and Scepter" prophecy--obviously seeing it as in the past. In the DSS commentary on Habakkuk (1QpHab) we find that the community has obviously lived through this past this 40 years "countdown" period with the Teacher long gone and the apocalyptic expectations of the arrival of the Kingdom of God anything but fulfilled. The Romans have by now invaded the country and propped up the puppet priests that the community despised as utterly corrupt (Hyrcanus II). Col I interprets the cry of the prophet Habakkuk of "How long?" as referring to the "beginning of the final generation." Col VI/VII is critical: …Write down the vision and make it plain upon the tablets, that he who reads may read it, and I will take my stand to watch, and I will station myself upon my fortress speedily [Hab 2:1-2]. [VII] And God told Habakkuk to write down that which would happen to the final generation, but He did not make known to him when time would come to an end. As for that which He said, That he who reads may read it speedily: interpreted, this concerns the Teacher of Righteousness, to whom God made known all the mysteries of the words of His servants the Prophets. For there shall be yet another vision concerning the appointed time. It shall tell of the end and shall not lie. Interpreted, this means that the final age shall be prolonged, and shall exceed all that the Prophets have said; for the mysteries of God are astounding. If it tarries, wait for it, for it shall surely come and shall not be late. Interpreted, this concerns the men of truth who keep the Torah, whose hands shall not slacked in the service of truth when the final age is prolonged. For all the ages of God reach their appointed end as he determines for them in the mysteries of His wisdom. Behold, his soul is puffed up and is not upright. Interpreted, this means that the wicked shall double their guilt upon themselves and it shall not be forgiven when they are judged…But the righteous shall live by his faith. Interpreted, this concerns all those who observe the Torah in the House of Judah, whom God will deliver from the House of Judgment because of their suffering and because of their faith in the Teacher of Righteousness. I think the evidence is strong, both internally and externally (dating of the texts--paleography/C-14), that the crisis of belief that this text reflects had come to a climax in the mid-first century B.C.E. In other words, surely by the time of the Roman invasion of Palestine (63 B.C.E.) and the reign of Herod the Great (37 BCE), such hopes and expectations had been severely tried and found wanting. I do not think the more general movement completely perished--that is what Boccaccini refers to as "Enochian Judaism" or as I would prefer: the Messianic movement in Palestine--from the Maccabees to Masada. It might well be the case, however, that as a specific party or school of thinking (the Yachad), the strict adherents to the figure of the Teacher of Righteousness were dispersed or largely faded away. Postscript:
Paul, in the mid decade of the 50's CE, writes that "the appointed time" has grown very short, an obvious reference to the material in Daniel 11-12, and he advises his followers to defer marriage and other social changes in view of the "impending distress" (1 Corinthians 7:25-31). Branch Davidians At this point all of these dates have passed and the community
seems forced to begin to talk in more general terms, such as "this [Waco
tragedy] generation will not pass until all these things are fulfilled."
|
|
SECTIONS: Hellenistic / Roman Religion & Philosophy | Archaeology and the Dead Sea Scrolls Christian Origins and the New Testament | Ancient Judaism Links | Gallery | About Dr. Tabor | Contact Dr. Tabor |